
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Troy, New York
April 1991 (For Graduation May 1991)
1. THE PROBLEM
The Mind/Body Problem
Definitions of Terms
The Meanings of the Four Propositions
Why Each Proposition Seems Plausible
The Related Problem of Free Will
Why Each Proposition Seems Plausible
2. THE THEORIES
The Six Categories of Solutions
Mind/Body Dualism
Mentalism
Physicalism
Neutral Monism
Emanationism
Supervenience
Summary
3. COMPARISONS
Interactionism vs. Occasionalism
Epiphenomenalism vs. Pre-established Harmony
Occasionalism vs. Pre-established Harmony
Objective Mentalism vs. Subjective Mentalism
Bell's Theorem and the Case for Subjective Mentalism
Other Alternatives to Einstein's Universe
Back to Mentalism
Objective Mentalism vs. Collective Mentalism
Strong Functionalism vs. Behaviorism
Strong Functionalism vs. Eliminative Materialism
Platonism vs. The Chain of Being
Panpsychism, Vitalism, and Emergentism
4. THE SOLUTION
Mind/Body Dualism vs. Relativity
A Better Explanation for the Spin-Measurement Experiments
The Functionalist Concept of Mental Events
Non-Algorithmic Mental Events
Why Neutral Monism Implies Empiricism
Why Matter Cannot Depend on Mind
The Extent of Idealism in the Other Theories
The Materialist Concept of Mind
Emergentism
The Implication for Epistemology: The Active Mind Theory
The Role of the Active Mind Theory in Education
The Active Mind Theory and Narcotics
The Implications for Religion: Atheism and Mortality
The Implication for Politics: Individualism
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
The second purpose of this essay is to argue that Emergentism is the correct solution to the problem. To this end, the third chapter will eliminate the weakest among similar theories. The fourth chapter will then compare Emergentism to the other theories that have survived chapter three. The fifth chapter will close this essay with a discussion of the implications that Emergentism has for epistemology, religion, politics, and other concerns.